Warning: session_start(): open(/tmp/sess_41ef1d61eea4ec0e765afc55e7cc448d, O_RDWR) failed: Disk quota exceeded (122) in /home/etiennepaul/public_html/wp-content/plugins/content-views-query-and-display-post-page/public/content-views.php on line 234

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/etiennepaul/public_html/wp-content/plugins/content-views-query-and-display-post-page/public/content-views.php:234) in /home/etiennepaul/public_html/wp-content/plugins/content-views-query-and-display-post-page/public/content-views.php on line 234

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/etiennepaul/public_html/wp-content/plugins/content-views-query-and-display-post-page/public/content-views.php:234) in /home/etiennepaul/public_html/wp-content/plugins/content-views-query-and-display-post-page/public/content-views.php on line 234
Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush Fight Over Who Flip-Flopped More - Buzzweep

Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush Fight Over Who Flip-Flopped More

By Elise Foley

Republican Presidential candidate Florida Senator Marco Rubio (L) speaks as former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush looks on during the Republican Presidential debate sponsored by Fox News at the Iowa Events Center in Des Moines, Iowa on January 28, 2016. / AFP / AFP PHOTO / Jim WATSON        (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

Republican Presidential candidate Florida Senator Marco Rubio (L) speaks as former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush looks on during the Republican Presidential debate sponsored by Fox News at the Iowa Events Center in Des Moines, Iowa on January 28, 2016. / AFP / AFP PHOTO / Jim WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

Neither Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) nor former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush can truthfully claim they’ve been fully consistent on how to deal with undocumented immigrants. At Thursday’s Republican presidential debate, they took a different tack — sniping back and forth in a way that laid bare that they’d both changed the way they talk about a path to citizenship.

Bush said he had laid out his own immigration plan for legal status in his book, during an attack on Rubio for backing away from his reform bill.

That gave Rubio an opening to hit back.

“That is the book where you changed your position on immigration,” Rubio said. “Because you used to support a path to citizenship.”

“So did you,” Bush retorted. “So did you, Marco.”

Rubio is right: Bush’s book did make a major flip from his prior statements on a path to citizenship. While Bush had previously said he would support one, in Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution, he and co-author Clint Bolick wrote that “a grant of citizenship is an undeserving reward for conduct that we cannot afford to encourage.” They said undocumented immigrants should still be eligible for citizenship if they went back to their native countries first and applied to return.

Bush is right, too. Rubio helped draft the so-called gang of eight immigration reform that overwhelmingly passed the Senate in 2013, and has since backed away from it, particularly its provision for a path to citizenship.

Moderator Megyn Kelly showed video of Rubio before his days in the Senate criticizing “blanket amnesty,” and asked whether he had flip-flopped on the issue.

Rubio argued during the debate that he can be trusted on immigration, and said his first priority on the issue was keeping ISIS out of the country. Next, he said he would enforce immigration laws, secure the borders, track people entering and exiting the country and require businesses to use the E-Verify system to check whether employees are legally eligible to work. (All of those are elements of the gang of eight bill.)

Once all of that is done, Rubio said, he would see what the American people are “willing to support” for undocumented immigrants. But it wouldn’t entail deporting all of them or “handing out citizenship cards,” he said.

Read the latest updates on the GOP debate here:

Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton Can’t Be A Crusader For Women’s Rights Because Of What Her Husband Did

Rand Paul said it is hypocritical for Hillary Clinton to push for women’s rights because of her husband Bill Clinton’s past sexual transgressions.

The Kentucky senator said that if a CEO had been found guilty of similar inappropriate behavior, he would be fired, shunned and never hired again. While he said he didn’t hold the Democratic candidate responsible, Paul said the former president’s actions weakened Hillary Clinton’s credibility.

“The thing is, she can’t be a champion of women’s rights at the same time she’s got this that is always lurking out there, this type of behavior. So it is difficult,” Paul said.

Katha Pollitt, a columnist at The Nation, noted the contradictions in Paul’s thinking in a New York Times op-ed earlier this week.

“Blaming the wife for the husband’s dalliances is an old old story, of course, which is being given a faux-feminist gloss today,” Pollitt wrote. “Now women who make the best of an imperfect marriage are not only still held to account for their husband’s behavior — that Hillary is a frigid harridan is still a popular theme on social media — they are blamed as co-conspirators or doormats for not walking out the door. And they’re called bad feminists for not embracing his other women.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

…read more

Source: More Fitness

You may also like...

Leave a Reply


Warning: Unknown: open(/tmp/sess_41ef1d61eea4ec0e765afc55e7cc448d, O_RDWR) failed: Disk quota exceeded (122) in Unknown on line 0

Warning: Unknown: Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0